PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. EYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. EYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NTSE having a 20.86% return and EYLD slightly lower at 20.78%.


NTSE

1D
-2.05%
1M
-6.67%
6M
13.48%
YTD
20.86%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*

EYLD

1D
-1.00%
1M
-4.12%
6M
14.48%
YTD
20.78%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. EYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
20.86%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.67%
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
20.78%29.39%4.72%18.77%-16.10%0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and EYLD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.76

The correlation between NTSE and EYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. EYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EYLD
EYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. EYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTSEEYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.09

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

10.12

-0.62

NTSE vs. EYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the EYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and EYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. EYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, roughly equal to the maximum EYLD drawdown of -41.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and EYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEEYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-41.82%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-10.52%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-20.89%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-29.27%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.63%

-5.56%

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-10.21%

-9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

3.21%

+0.98%

Volatility

NTSE vs. EYLD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) at 6.85%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEEYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

6.85%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.38%

17.72%

+4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.41%

19.87%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.13%

18.54%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

21.78%

-1.85%

NTSE vs. EYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EYLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSE vs. EYLD - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than EYLD's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
5.04%5.40%5.16%5.54%6.97%7.27%3.02%4.21%7.87%2.77%0.75%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.72%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and EYLD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to EYLD (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs EYLD's -41.82%.

On 5-year performance, EYLD leads with 9.87% vs 5.20% for NTSE. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EYLD has been the lower-risk option at 6.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EYLD has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EYLD.

EYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 2.72% for NTSE.

NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while EYLD is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.65% for EYLD.

EYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and EYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer