NTSE vs. DHS
NTSE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. NTSE is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSE returned 6.15%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for DHS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.
Performance
NTSE vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than DHS's 11.10% return.
NTSE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 30.29%
- 6M
- 33.64%
- 1Y
- 59.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
NTSE vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 30.29% | 36.29% | 4.42% | 9.47% | -26.31% | -5.66% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 11.10% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSE and DHS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.39 |
The correlation between NTSE and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NTSE vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSE
DHS
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
NTSE
DHS
Financial Services
NTSE
DHS
Communication Services
NTSE
DHS
Technology
NTSE
DHS
Basic Materials
NTSE
DHS
Consumer Defensive
NTSE
DHS
Industrials
NTSE
DHS
Healthcare
NTSE
DHS
Energy
NTSE
DHS
Real Estate
NTSE
DHS
Utilities
NTSE
DHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSE vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
NTSE
DHS
NTSE vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSE | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.40 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 3.64 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.27 | 13.37 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSE | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 2.29 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.78 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
NTSE vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSE | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -67.25% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -6.30% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | -11.87% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.84% | -15.28% | -27.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -1.52% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -9.55% | -10.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 1.71% | +1.95% |
Volatility
NTSE vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.05%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSE | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.12% | 3.05% | +6.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.25% | 7.36% | +10.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.79% | 10.06% | +10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 13.90% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 16.08% | +3.16% |
NTSE vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NTSE and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Dividends
NTSE vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than DHS's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.32% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 2.54% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.44% | 3.22% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSE and DHS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to DHS (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs DHS's -67.25%.
On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 10.83% vs 6.15% for NTSE. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSE and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.54% for NTSE.
NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities.
NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSE and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer