PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than DHS's 11.10% return.


NTSE

1D
-1.31%
1M
7.69%
YTD
30.29%
6M
33.64%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

DHS

1D
1.10%
1M
0.51%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.95%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
30.29%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.66%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
11.10%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and DHS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.39

The correlation between NTSE and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NTSE vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSE
DHS

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

2.1%
22.3%

Communication Services

1.8%
9.3%

Technology

0.8%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
18.7%

Industrials

0.2%
4.1%

Healthcare

0.2%
14.5%

Energy

0.1%
9.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.8%

Utilities

0.0%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSE
2.2%
DHS
5.0%

Financial Services

NTSE
2.1%
DHS
22.3%

Communication Services

NTSE
1.8%
DHS
9.3%

Technology

NTSE
0.8%
DHS
3.7%

Basic Materials

NTSE
0.5%
DHS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

NTSE
0.3%
DHS
18.7%

Industrials

NTSE
0.2%
DHS
4.1%

Healthcare

NTSE
0.2%
DHS
14.5%

Energy

NTSE
0.1%
DHS
9.4%

Real Estate

NTSE
0.1%
DHS
2.8%

Utilities

NTSE
0.0%
DHS
9.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSEDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.64

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

13.37

+2.90

NTSE vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSEDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.29

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.78

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.41

-0.04

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-67.25%

+24.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-6.30%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-11.87%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.84%

-15.28%

-27.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-1.52%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-9.55%

-10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

1.71%

+1.95%

Volatility

NTSE vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.05%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

3.05%

+6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.25%

7.36%

+10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

10.06%

+10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

13.90%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

16.08%

+3.16%

NTSE vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NTSE and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

NTSE vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than DHS's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.32%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.54%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and DHS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to DHS (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 10.83% vs 6.15% for NTSE. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSE and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.54% for NTSE.

NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer