NTSD vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

NTSD vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NTSD

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSD vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	17.91%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSD and GDMN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	0.71

Return for Risk

NTSD vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSD vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTSD	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.08	0.80	+4.28

Drawdowns

NTSD vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSD	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-52.82%	+47.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-37.06%	+35.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-18.89%	+18.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NTSD	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	51.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.28%	61.32%	-37.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.28%	47.59%	-23.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.28%	47.59%	-23.31%

NTSD vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSD vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSD and GDMN in my portfolio?

NTSD and GDMN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NTSD or GDMN?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSD or GDMN?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSD or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

What is the main difference between NTSD and GDMN?

NTSD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.45% for GDMN.