NTSD vs. DHS
NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. NTSD is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
NTSD vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
NTSD vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 18.50% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSD and DHS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSD vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DHS
NTSD vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSD | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSD vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.58%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSD | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -67.25% | +61.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -9.50% | +8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
NTSD vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSD | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 10.31% | +12.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 13.90% | +9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 16.08% | +7.16% |
NTSD vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSD vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
NTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than DHS's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.09% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSD and DHS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.14% for NTSD.
NTSD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.38% for DHS.
Find the right allocation for NTSD and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer