NTSD vs. CRMG
NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NTSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
NTSD vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -29.64%
- YTD
- -71.26%
- 6M
- -71.01%
- 1Y
- -73.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -42.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSD and CRMG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSD vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
NTSD vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSD | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSD vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.58%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSD and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSD | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -79.83% | +74.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -78.97% | +76.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -39.18% | +38.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.41% | — |
Volatility
NTSD vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSD | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 76.12% | -51.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 75.39% | -50.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 75.39% | -50.28% |
NTSD vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSD vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTSD nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSD and CRMG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRMG.
NTSD and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NTSD and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for NTSD and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer