NTRS vs. CME
NTRS (Northern Trust Corporation) and CME (CME Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — NTRS in Asset Management, CME in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges. Over the past 10 years, NTRS returned 12.65%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for CME. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTRS vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTRS achieves a 28.95% return, which is significantly higher than CME's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, NTRS has underperformed CME with an annualized return of 12.65%, while CME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
NTRS
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 28.95%
- 6M
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 63.49%
- 3Y*
- 36.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
CME
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
NTRS vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 28.95% | 36.92% | 25.63% | -1.02% | -23.82% | 31.65% | -9.29% | 30.59% | -14.68% | 14.18% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 1.58% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRS and CME is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2002 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NTRS and CME has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NTRS:
$9.09
CME:
$11.75
NTRS:
19.17
CME:
22.94
NTRS:
1.51
CME:
2.00
NTRS:
2.33
CME:
14.40
NTRS:
$14.30B
CME:
$6.76B
NTRS:
$8.09B
CME:
$5.84B
NTRS:
$3.21B
CME:
$5.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTRS vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
NTRS
CME
NTRS vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTRS | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.05 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.15 | 0.16 | +4.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | 0.50 | +13.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTRS vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRS drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRS and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTRS | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -77.50% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -21.42% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | -21.42% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.03% | -31.74% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.03% | -37.36% | -12.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.03% | +15.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -20.68% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 6.70% | -2.12% |
Volatility
NTRS vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is 6.42%, while CME Group Inc. (CME) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that NTRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTRS | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 10.45% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.10% | 17.44% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 20.74% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 20.15% | +9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 23.93% | +6.47% |
Dividends
NTRS vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
NTRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than CME's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 1.84% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 2.34% | 3.01% | 2.45% | 2.32% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.96% |
Financials
NTRS vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northern Trust Corporation and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTRS vs. CME - Profitability Comparison
NTRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.12B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.8%.
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.
NTRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported an operating income of 625.80M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.7%.
NTRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported a net income of 466.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 61.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTRS and CME have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CME has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to NTRS (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRS dropped -67.67% vs CME's -77.50%.
NTRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTRS and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer