NTRS vs. ARKG
NTRS (Northern Trust Corporation) is a stock, while ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Over the past 10 years, NTRS returned 13.21%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for ARKG. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NTRS vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTRS achieves a 34.92% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 40.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NTRS has outperformed ARKG with an annualized return of 13.21%, while ARKG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.50% annualized return.
NTRS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- YTD
- 34.92%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 35.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
ARKG
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- 6M
- 34.23%
- YTD
- 40.49%
- 1Y
- 68.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- -14.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.55M | $112.06M | $122.67M | |
| $226.42M | $199.37M | $188.33M |
NTRS vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 34.92% | 36.92% | 25.63% | -1.02% | -23.82% | 31.65% | -9.29% | 30.59% | -14.68% | 14.18% |
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 40.49% | 23.04% | -28.24% | 16.22% | -53.90% | -33.92% | 180.40% | 44.00% | -1.26% | 46.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRS and ARKG is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTRS vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank
NTRS
ARKG
NTRS vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTRS | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 2.50 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 5.99 | +4.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTRS vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRS drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRS and ARKG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTRS | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -83.59% | +15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -27.51% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | -46.45% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.03% | -79.00% | +28.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.03% | -83.59% | +33.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -63.58% | +59.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -36.29% | +15.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 11.48% | -6.98% |
Volatility
NTRS vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is 7.02%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 11.16%. This indicates that NTRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTRS | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 11.16% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.84% | 31.32% | -12.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 43.13% | -18.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 46.22% | -16.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 41.46% | -11.23% |
Dividends
NTRS vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison
NTRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 1.75% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 2.34% | 3.01% | 2.45% | 2.32% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTRS and ARKG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKG has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to NTRS (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRS dropped -67.67% vs ARKG's -83.59%.
NTRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTRS and ARKG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer