PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTRA vs. PVLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTRA vs. PVLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Palvella Therapeutics, Inc (PVLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTRA achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than PVLA's 13.38% return.


NTRA

1D
2.60%
1M
15.54%
YTD
2.48%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
37.79%
3Y*
65.95%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
33.08%

PVLA

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.11%
YTD
13.38%
6M
18.36%
1Y
426.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTRA vs. PVLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
2.48%44.72%-4.95%
PVLA
Palvella Therapeutics, Inc
13.38%772.25%-8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NTRA and PVLA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTRA:

$33.22B

PVLA:

$1.34B

EPS

NTRA:

-$1.64

PVLA:

-$3.75

PB Ratio

NTRA:

18.73

PVLA:

47.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTRA:

$2.50B

PVLA:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTRA:

$1.63B

PVLA:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

NTRA:

-$294.86M

PVLA:

-$14.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTRA vs. PVLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTRA
NTRA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PVLA
PVLA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PVLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PVLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTRA vs. PVLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Palvella Therapeutics, Inc (PVLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTRAPVLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.54

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

13.82

-12.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

31.14

-28.34

NTRA vs. PVLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the PVLA Sharpe Ratio of 5.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTRA and PVLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTRA vs. PVLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTRA drawdown since its inception was -77.74%, which is greater than PVLA's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRA and PVLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTRAPVLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.74%

-31.48%

-46.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.20%

-31.11%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.72%

-19.99%

+12.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-11.16%

-22.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.52%

13.79%

-0.27%

Volatility

NTRA vs. PVLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natera, Inc. (NTRA) is 12.58%, while Palvella Therapeutics, Inc (PVLA) has a volatility of 19.68%. This indicates that NTRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTRAPVLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

19.68%

-7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.53%

61.91%

-26.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.14%

80.85%

-37.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.02%

82.11%

-25.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.82%

82.11%

-21.29%

Dividends

NTRA vs. PVLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTRA nor PVLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NTRA vs. PVLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Natera, Inc. and Palvella Therapeutics, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
696.64M
0
(NTRA) Total Revenue
(PVLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NTRA and PVLA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVLA has higher volatility (19.68%) compared to NTRA (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRA dropped -77.74% vs PVLA's -31.48%.

PVLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTRA and PVLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer