PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTR vs. JFLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTR vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than JFLI's 7.84% return.


NTR

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
9.80%
6M
15.63%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

JFLI

1D
0.43%
1M
0.27%
YTD
7.84%
6M
7.85%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTR vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
9.80%26.50%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.84%9.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NTR and JFLI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTR vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTR
NTR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JFLI
JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTR vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTRJFLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.80

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

13.38

-11.32

NTR vs. JFLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the JFLI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTR and JFLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTRJFLIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

2.14

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

1.13

-0.95

Drawdowns

NTR vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and JFLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTRJFLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.80%

-12.87%

-44.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.36%

-6.67%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.68%

-2.19%

-29.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-1.44%

-24.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

1.39%

+6.69%

Volatility

NTR vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison

Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) at 3.23%. This indicates that NTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTRJFLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

3.23%

+3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.59%

7.35%

+18.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.67%

8.74%

+22.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.18%

12.03%

+22.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

12.03%

+21.94%

Dividends

NTR vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison

NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than JFLI's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.33%6.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
3.25%3.53%4.83%3.76%3.51%2.45%3.74%3.67%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTR and JFLI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTR has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to JFLI (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs JFLI's -12.87%.

JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTR and JFLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer