PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTNX vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTNX vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a -4.60% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -15.74% return.


NTNX

1D
0.20%
1M
8.28%
YTD
-4.60%
6M
3.64%
1Y
-31.64%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*

UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTNX vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NTNX
Nutanix, Inc.
-4.60%-15.51%28.29%83.07%-18.24%-0.03%1.95%-15.67%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NTNX and UBER is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between NTNX and UBER has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTNX:

$14.40B

UBER:

$142.62B

EPS

NTNX:

$0.93

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

NTNX:

52.74

UBER:

16.98

PS Ratio

NTNX:

5.29

UBER:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.75B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.39B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTNX:

$293.53M

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTNX vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTNX
NTNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTNX vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTNXUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.92

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.62

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-1.09

+0.14

NTNX vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is comparable to the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTNX and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTNX vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTNXUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-68.05%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.58%

-31.46%

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.58%

-31.46%

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.71%

-60.45%

-8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.64%

-31.22%

-9.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.57%

-25.67%

-14.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.53%

17.93%

+16.60%

Volatility

NTNX vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 7.96%. This indicates that NTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTNXUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

7.96%

+8.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.92%

23.21%

+12.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.13%

32.66%

+13.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.73%

44.82%

+4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.51%

50.61%

+7.90%

Dividends

NTNX vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTNX nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NTNX vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutanix, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
703.07M
13.20B
(NTNX) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTNX vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutanix, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
86.9%
45.0%
Portfolio components
NTNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 610.68M and revenue of 703.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

NTNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported an operating income of 68.56M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

NTNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a net income of 72.09M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTNX and UBER have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTNX has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to UBER (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs UBER's -68.05%.

UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTNX and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer