NTES vs. HOOD
NTES (NetEase, Inc.) and HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. NTES operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while HOOD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, NTES returned 12.50%/yr vs 113.32%/yr for HOOD. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTES vs. HOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTES achieves a -7.12% return, which is significantly higher than HOOD's -17.60% return.
NTES
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -8.13%
- 1Y
- -0.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
HOOD
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 15.48%
- YTD
- -17.60%
- 6M
- -22.02%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 113.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTES vs. HOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTES NetEase, Inc. | -7.12% | 58.28% | -1.73% | 30.59% | -27.35% | 2.12% |
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -17.60% | 203.54% | 192.46% | 56.51% | -54.17% | -53.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTES and HOOD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
NTES:
$81.21B
HOOD:
$85.27B
NTES:
CN¥52.95
HOOD:
$2.07
NTES:
16.10
HOOD:
45.04
NTES:
0.76
HOOD:
0.00
NTES:
4.80
HOOD:
21.83
NTES:
3.34
HOOD:
8.80
NTES:
CN¥114.39B
HOOD:
$3.91B
NTES:
CN¥75.14B
HOOD:
$2.86B
NTES:
CN¥40.24B
HOOD:
$1.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTES vs. HOOD — Risk / Return Rank
NTES
HOOD
NTES vs. HOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTES | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.12 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.46 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 0.83 | -1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTES vs. HOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTES drawdown since its inception was -96.54%, which is greater than HOOD's maximum drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTES and HOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTES | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.54% | -90.21% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -57.26% | +26.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.97% | -57.26% | +23.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.45% | -38.88% | +19.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -60.85% | +36.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 31.69% | -14.51% |
Volatility
NTES vs. HOOD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NetEase, Inc. (NTES) is 9.60%, while Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a volatility of 23.07%. This indicates that NTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTES | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 23.07% | -13.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.92% | 50.85% | -29.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.31% | 69.33% | -40.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.67% | 74.06% | -30.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.81% | 74.06% | -32.25% |
Dividends
NTES vs. HOOD - Dividend Comparison
NTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while HOOD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2.40% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 3.19% | 0.71% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.98% |
Financials
NTES vs. HOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetEase, Inc. and Robinhood Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTES vs. HOOD - Profitability Comparison
NTES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
HOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.
HOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NTES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.
HOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 346.00M and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in a net margin of 96.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTES and HOOD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOD has higher volatility (23.07%) compared to NTES (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTES dropped -96.54% vs HOOD's -90.21%.
HOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTES and HOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer