NTDSX vs. URFFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NTDSX (Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, NTDSX returned 9.96%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for URFFX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. NTDSX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTDSX achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NTDSX having a 9.96% annualized return and URFFX not far ahead at 10.12%.

NTDSX

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 8.00%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 22.09%
• 3Y*: 15.89%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 9.96%
• ALL TIME*: 9.09%

URFFX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 9.62%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 1Y: 24.29%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 10.12%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	10.93%	19.34%	13.05%	20.34%	-18.88%	17.02%	13.67%	20.80%	-9.18%	17.49%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	13.05%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	20.16%	-9.01%	19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NTDSX and URFFX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2010	0.97

The correlation between NTDSX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NTDSX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTDSX

NTDSX Risk / Return Rank: 65
NTDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NTDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NTDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NTDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
NTDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTDSX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.91	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.69	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.87	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	12.30	-2.60

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTDSX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTDSX drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTDSX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTDSX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-44.25%	+8.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-7.89%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.84%	-14.14%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.77%	-23.76%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	-29.97%	-5.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.17%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-5.88%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.84%	+0.24%

Volatility

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) at 2.93%. This indicates that NTDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTDSX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	2.93%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	9.82%	+0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	11.86%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	13.97%	+1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.48%	14.33%	+2.15%

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTDSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTDSX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

NTDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than URFFX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	9.22%	10.19%	15.40%	4.76%	2.54%	8.37%	6.68%	6.82%	9.92%	3.40%	5.85%	4.96%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.72%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTDSX and URFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, NTDSX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NTDSX or URFFX?

NTDSX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to URFFX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTDSX dropped -35.39% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.