NTDSX vs. JIEHX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NTDSX (Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund) and JIEHX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, NTDSX returned 9.01%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for JIEHX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NTDSX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JIEHX.

Performance

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTDSX achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than JIEHX's 12.46% return.

NTDSX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 6M: 12.04%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: 10.23%

JIEHX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 12.88%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	11.28%	19.34%	13.05%	20.34%	-18.88%	17.02%	13.67%	20.80%	-9.18%	16.83%
JIEHX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio	12.46%	20.12%	15.37%	18.47%	-18.03%	18.48%	16.08%	25.00%	-8.22%	16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NTDSX and JIEHX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.98

The correlation between NTDSX and JIEHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NTDSX vs. JIEHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTDSX

NTDSX Risk / Return Rank: 61
NTDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
NTDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NTDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NTDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
NTDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

JIEHX

JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 68
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTDSX	JIEHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.35	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.25	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.43	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.10	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	13.75	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTDSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the JIEHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTDSX and JIEHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTDSX	JIEHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.35	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.65	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.70	-0.12

Drawdowns

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTDSX drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than JIEHX's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTDSX and JIEHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTDSX	JIEHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-32.55%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.88%	-9.18%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.84%	-16.15%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.77%	-25.70%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.38%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-4.99%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.06%	-0.06%

Volatility

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTDSX	JIEHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	3.51%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	9.63%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	12.10%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.66%	15.23%	+0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.52%	16.44%	+0.08%

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTDSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JIEHX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTDSX vs. JIEHX - Dividend Comparison

NTDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than JIEHX's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIEHX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio	3.15%	3.55%	1.76%	2.17%	6.57%	5.15%	3.18%	6.88%	6.99%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	9.17%	10.19%	15.40%	4.76%	2.54%	8.37%	6.68%	6.82%	9.92%	3.40%	5.85%	4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTDSX and JIEHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, NTDSX and JIEHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NTDSX or JIEHX?

NTDSX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to JIEHX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTDSX dropped -35.39% vs JIEHX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.