NTDSX vs. DRIJX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NTDSX (Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund) and DRIJX (Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, NTDSX returned 10.49%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for DRIJX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NTDSX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DRIJX.

Performance

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NTDSX having a 9.12% return and DRIJX slightly higher at 9.16%. Over the past 10 years, NTDSX has underperformed DRIJX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while DRIJX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.

NTDSX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 6M: 8.22%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

DRIJX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.35%
• YTD: 9.16%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 22.31%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	9.12%	19.34%	13.05%	20.34%	-18.88%	17.02%	13.67%	20.80%	-9.18%	17.49%
DRIJX Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	9.16%	19.64%	17.05%	21.37%	-15.25%	21.63%	14.09%	25.59%	-9.14%	21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NTDSX and DRIJX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.97

The correlation between NTDSX and DRIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NTDSX vs. DRIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTDSX

NTDSX Risk / Return Rank: 56
NTDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
NTDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NTDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NTDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
NTDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DRIJX

DRIJX Risk / Return Rank: 72
DRIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DRIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DRIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DRIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DRIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTDSX	DRIJX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.06	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.88	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.77	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	12.17	-1.57

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the DRIJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTDSX and DRIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTDSX drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than DRIJX's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTDSX and DRIJX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTDSX	DRIJX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-33.55%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-8.12%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.84%	-15.25%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.77%	-23.49%	-7.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	-33.55%	-1.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-2.26%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-4.17%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	1.84%	+0.20%

Volatility

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund (NTDSX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) at 4.48%. This indicates that NTDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTDSX	DRIJX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	4.48%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.41%	9.10%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	10.98%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.78%	14.65%	+1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.50%	15.59%	+0.91%

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTDSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIJX's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTDSX vs. DRIJX - Dividend Comparison

NTDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, more than DRIJX's 2.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRIJX Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	2.32%	2.49%	2.53%	3.40%	3.98%	2.87%	4.15%	2.18%	2.29%	1.25%	1.40%	0.00%
NTDSX Nationwide Destination 2055 Fund	9.37%	10.19%	15.40%	4.76%	2.54%	8.37%	6.68%	6.82%	9.92%	3.40%	5.85%	4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTDSX and DRIJX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, NTDSX and DRIJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NTDSX or DRIJX?

NTDSX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to DRIJX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTDSX dropped -35.39% vs DRIJX's -33.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.