PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSTLX vs. NGUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) and Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSTLX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than NGUAX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NSTLX has underperformed NGUAX with an annualized return of 4.04%, while NGUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.


NSTLX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.92%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
4.04%

NGUAX

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.03%
6M
5.21%
1Y
17.45%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSTLX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund
0.56%9.44%6.02%10.07%-11.81%2.94%7.78%10.55%-2.34%7.00%
NGUAX
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund
6.03%14.38%23.80%35.98%-24.47%27.43%34.56%36.69%-7.16%25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NSTLX and NGUAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2003

0.24

The correlation between NSTLX and NGUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSTLX vs. NGUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSTLX
NSTLX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NSTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NSTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NGUAX
NGUAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NGUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NGUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NGUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NGUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NGUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) and Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSTLXNGUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.29

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

4.44

+2.91

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSTLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the NGUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSTLX and NGUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSTLXNGUAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.36

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.68

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.88

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.04

+0.83

Drawdowns

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSTLX drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum NGUAX drawdown of -78.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTLX and NGUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSTLXNGUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-78.07%

+59.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-14.16%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.85%

-20.89%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.65%

-28.43%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.00%

-31.99%

+12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.35%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-31.87%

+29.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

4.10%

-3.20%

Volatility

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) is 1.37%, while Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund (NGUAX) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that NSTLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NGUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSTLXNGUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

3.16%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

10.21%

-7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

13.43%

-9.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

18.26%

-13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

18.26%

-13.27%

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSTLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NGUAX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSTLX vs. NGUAX - Dividend Comparison

NSTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than NGUAX's 11.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NGUAX
Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund
11.72%12.43%6.01%4.30%6.62%10.92%7.60%6.21%11.21%6.87%13.11%12.82%
NSTLX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund
5.55%5.46%5.31%5.38%3.92%6.29%3.81%4.02%4.33%3.64%3.54%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSTLX and NGUAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NGUAX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to NSTLX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSTLX dropped -19.00% vs NGUAX's -78.07%.

NSTLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSTLX and NGUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer