NSTAX vs. JMSIX
NSTAX (Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A) and JMSIX (JPMorgan Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NSTAX returned 3.56%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for JMSIX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NSTAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMSIX.
Performance
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSTAX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NSTAX has underperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 3.56%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.95% annualized return.
NSTAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
JMSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTAX Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A | 0.41% | 9.04% | 5.64% | 8.64% | -12.06% | 2.55% | 7.36% | 10.09% | -2.71% | 6.55% |
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 1.11% | 7.68% | 7.78% | 6.14% | -8.24% | 3.59% | 3.07% | 11.82% | 1.03% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSTAX and JMSIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between NSTAX and JMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSTAX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NSTAX
JMSIX
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A (NSTAX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSTAX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.57 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.43 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 14.19 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSTAX drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, roughly equal to the maximum JMSIX drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTAX and JMSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSTAX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.01% | -18.40% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.29% | -1.62% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.91% | -2.31% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.86% | -11.39% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.01% | -18.40% | -0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.35% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -2.56% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.39% | +0.56% |
Volatility
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A (NSTAX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) at 0.77%. This indicates that NSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSTAX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 0.77% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 1.93% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60% | 2.54% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 3.73% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 3.87% | +1.07% |
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSTAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSTAX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison
NSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than JMSIX's 6.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 6.04% | 5.95% | 5.78% | 4.43% | 4.78% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 5.43% | 5.42% | 0.46% | 0.00% |
NSTAX Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A | 5.18% | 5.10% | 4.95% | 4.14% | 3.60% | 5.90% | 3.44% | 3.62% | 3.94% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSTAX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSTAX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to JMSIX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSTAX dropped -19.01% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.
JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSTAX and JMSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer