PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSTAX vs. DBSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A (NSTAX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSTAX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than DBSCX's 1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, NSTAX has underperformed DBSCX with an annualized return of 3.56%, while DBSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.59% annualized return.


NSTAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1.03%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
3.56%

DBSCX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.07%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
4.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSTAX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A
0.41%9.04%5.64%8.64%-12.06%2.55%7.36%10.09%-2.71%6.55%
DBSCX
Doubleline Selective Credit Fund
1.99%8.46%7.78%8.55%-8.10%4.13%1.83%5.68%3.03%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NSTAX and DBSCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.48

Over the past year, NSTAX and DBSCX have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSTAX vs. DBSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSTAX
NSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DBSCX
DBSCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DBSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DBSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A (NSTAX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSTAXDBSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.75

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

4.89

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

19.84

-13.72

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the DBSCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSTAX and DBSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSTAX drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, which is greater than DBSCX's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTAX and DBSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSTAXDBSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-14.12%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-1.32%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.91%

-1.91%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-9.52%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.01%

-14.12%

-4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.13%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-1.24%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.32%

+0.63%

Volatility

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A (NSTAX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) at 0.65%. This indicates that NSTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSTAXDBSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.65%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

1.54%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

2.01%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

2.72%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

2.91%

+2.03%

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSTAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DBSCX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSTAX vs. DBSCX - Dividend Comparison

NSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than DBSCX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBSCX
Doubleline Selective Credit Fund
6.55%6.50%7.09%6.77%6.67%4.68%4.64%6.04%7.43%9.01%9.73%9.53%
NSTAX
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A
5.18%5.10%4.95%4.14%3.60%5.90%3.44%3.62%3.94%3.23%3.14%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSTAX and DBSCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSTAX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to DBSCX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSTAX dropped -19.01% vs DBSCX's -14.12%.

DBSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSTAX and DBSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer