NSSC vs. MU
NSSC (Napco Security Technologies, Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. NSSC operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, NSSC returned 28.00%/yr vs 55.83%/yr for MU. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NSSC vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSSC achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return. Over the past 10 years, NSSC has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 28.00%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.83% annualized return.
NSSC
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -10.06%
- 6M
- -10.89%
- 1Y
- 36.80%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- 17.77%
- 10Y*
- 28.00%
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 35.46%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
NSSC vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSSC Napco Security Technologies, Inc. | -10.06% | 19.22% | 4.97% | 25.59% | 9.96% | 90.62% | -10.79% | 86.60% | 80.00% | 2.94% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSSC and MU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.11 |
The correlation between NSSC and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NSSC:
$1.33B
MU:
$1.12T
NSSC:
$1.03
MU:
$21.26
NSSC:
36.28
MU:
46.18
NSSC:
1.31
MU:
0.17
NSSC:
6.79
MU:
19.16
NSSC:
7.47
MU:
15.44
NSSC:
$197.23M
MU:
$58.12B
NSSC:
$112.37M
MU:
$33.96B
NSSC:
$42.52M
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSSC vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
NSSC
MU
NSSC vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSSC | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.78 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 24.91 | -23.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.54 | 94.64 | -91.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSSC vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSSC drawdown since its inception was -93.20%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSSC and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSSC | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.20% | -98.25% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.72% | -30.28% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.43% | -57.63% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.43% | -57.63% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.43% | -57.63% | -7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.82% | -9.07% | -24.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.20% | -58.16% | +19.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.52% | 7.95% | +1.57% |
Volatility
NSSC vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) is 10.62%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that NSSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSSC | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 32.86% | -22.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.37% | 57.74% | -25.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.31% | 69.66% | -27.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.99% | 53.18% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.57% | 50.12% | -0.55% |
Dividends
NSSC vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
NSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
NSSC Napco Security Technologies, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NSSC vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Napco Security Technologies, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NSSC vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
NSSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 29.49M and revenue of 49.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
NSSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.19M and revenue of 49.17M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
NSSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -408.00K and revenue of 49.17M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NSSC and MU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to NSSC (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSSC dropped -93.20% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSSC and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer