NSMVX vs. HFCGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NSMVX (North Star Micro Cap Fund) and HFCGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NSMVX returned 9.27%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for HFCGX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NSMVX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for HFCGX.

Performance

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Star Micro Cap Fund (NSMVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSMVX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than HFCGX's 16.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NSMVX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.

NSMVX

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 17.80%
• 3Y*: 12.72%
• 5Y*: 0.78%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

HFCGX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 16.49%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 12.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NSMVX North Star Micro Cap Fund	10.02%	-0.97%	15.30%	22.31%	-24.84%	14.12%	37.19%	19.52%	-13.50%	4.84%
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	16.49%	4.78%	31.45%	19.58%	-4.97%	29.94%	17.73%	20.70%	-21.39%	16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NSMVX and HFCGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2013	0.76

The correlation between NSMVX and HFCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NSMVX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSMVX

NSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 14
NSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
NSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
NSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
NSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
NSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

HFCGX

HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Micro Cap Fund (NSMVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSMVX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.81	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	2.65	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.31	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	3.00	-1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.85	9.88	-6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSMVX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSMVX	HFCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.81	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.56	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.50	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.39	+0.05

Drawdowns

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSMVX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, smaller than the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSMVX and HFCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSMVX	HFCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.32%	-62.35%	+21.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-7.82%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.82%	-22.86%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.82%	-26.30%	-14.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.32%	-54.22%	+12.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	-0.05%	-1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.44%	-15.23%	+4.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	2.37%	+2.17%

Volatility

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

North Star Micro Cap Fund (NSMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) at 4.46%. This indicates that NSMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSMVX	HFCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	4.46%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.92%	9.45%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	12.93%	+5.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	24.06%	-4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	25.81%	-5.69%

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSMVX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSMVX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

NSMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCGX Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.11%	0.38%	3.58%	26.58%	0.00%	0.00%	10.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%
NSMVX North Star Micro Cap Fund	3.38%	3.72%	2.98%	0.72%	0.26%	3.30%	0.01%	0.94%	7.51%	3.22%	3.34%	5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSMVX and HFCGX in my portfolio?

NSMVX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NSMVX or HFCGX?

NSMVX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to HFCGX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSMVX dropped -41.32% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.