NSMRX vs. SWSSX
NSMRX (Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund) and SWSSX (Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NSMRX returned 12.80%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for SWSSX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSMRX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWSSX.
Performance
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSMRX achieves a 18.58% return, which is significantly lower than SWSSX's 20.72% return. Over the past 10 years, NSMRX has outperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.44% annualized return.
NSMRX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 18.58%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 37.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
SWSSX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 43.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSMRX Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 18.58% | 12.10% | 20.17% | 14.45% | -5.69% | 39.41% | 0.97% | 30.56% | -19.00% | 10.35% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 20.72% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSMRX and SWSSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NSMRX and SWSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSMRX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
NSMRX
SWSSX
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (NSMRX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSMRX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.91 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.06 | 13.84 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSMRX drawdown since its inception was -68.14%, which is greater than SWSSX's maximum drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSMRX and SWSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSMRX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.14% | -60.34% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -11.00% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.02% | -27.50% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.02% | -31.93% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.57% | -41.81% | -2.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | 0.00% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.39% | -10.71% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.10% | -0.21% |
Volatility
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (NSMRX) is 6.02%, while Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that NSMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSMRX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 6.76% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 14.36% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 19.71% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 22.68% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 24.14% | -2.70% |
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSMRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSMRX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
NSMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than SWSSX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSMRX Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 5.81% | 6.89% | 11.02% | 0.69% | 5.19% | 19.32% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 43.81% | 5.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSMRX and SWSSX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWSSX has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to NSMRX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSMRX dropped -68.14% vs SWSSX's -60.34%.
SWSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSMRX and SWSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer