PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSIUX vs. NOSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (NSIUX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSIUX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than NOSGX's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, NSIUX has underperformed NOSGX with an annualized return of 1.03%, while NOSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.


NSIUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.06%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
1.03%

NOSGX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.72%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.39%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSIUX
Northern Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
-0.06%4.74%2.72%3.51%-6.32%-1.69%3.87%4.29%0.41%0.37%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
16.32%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NSIUX and NOSGX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1999

-0.19

The correlation between NSIUX and NOSGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSIUX vs. NOSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSIUX
NSIUX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NSIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NSIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (NSIUX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSIUXNOSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

4.22

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

14.59

-9.29

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the NOSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSIUX and NOSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSIUXNOSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.15

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.28

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.35

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.40

+0.56

Drawdowns

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSIUX drawdown since its inception was -9.56%, smaller than the maximum NOSGX drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSIUX and NOSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSIUXNOSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-56.92%

+47.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-9.07%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.87%

-28.13%

+26.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.15%

-28.34%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.56%

-45.66%

+36.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.17%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-9.05%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.60%

-2.05%

Volatility

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (NSIUX) is 0.67%, while Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that NSIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSIUXNOSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

4.74%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

11.73%

-10.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18%

17.79%

-15.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.97%

23.84%

-20.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.43%

24.56%

-22.13%

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSIUX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than NOSGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSIUX vs. NOSGX - Dividend Comparison

NSIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than NOSGX's 37.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.82%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%
NSIUX
Northern Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
3.20%2.49%2.68%2.34%1.02%0.09%0.46%1.79%2.39%1.30%0.96%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSIUX and NOSGX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOSGX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to NSIUX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSIUX dropped -9.56% vs NOSGX's -56.92%.

NOSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSIUX and NOSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer