PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSI vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSI vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSI achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.


NSI

1D
1.37%
1M
5.14%
YTD
19.35%
6M
21.16%
1Y
45.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-2.39%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
1.71%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSI vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NSI
National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
19.35%35.94%-1.21%4.68%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.28%74.16%35.03%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NSI and SHLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.37

NSI vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NSI
SHLD

Technology

34.0%
11.8%

Financial Services

20.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%

-

Communication Services

10.1%

-

Basic Materials

8.0%

-

Energy

3.9%

-

Industrials

2.9%
88.2%

Healthcare

2.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Utilities

1.5%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Technology

NSI
34.0%
SHLD
11.8%

Financial Services

NSI
20.2%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

NSI
13.5%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

NSI
10.1%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

NSI
8.0%
SHLD

-

Energy

NSI
3.9%
SHLD

-

Industrials

NSI
2.9%
SHLD
88.2%

Healthcare

NSI
2.9%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

NSI
2.5%
SHLD

-

Utilities

NSI
1.5%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

NSI
0.6%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSI vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSI
NSI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSI vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSISHLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

0.41

+2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

0.74

+2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.08

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

0.49

+2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.53

1.30

+11.23

NSI vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSI and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSISHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

0.41

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

2.00

-0.71

Drawdowns

NSI vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSI drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSI and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSISHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-20.10%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-20.10%

+6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.85%

+18.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-3.19%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

7.51%

-3.82%

Volatility

NSI vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is 6.90%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that NSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSISHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

7.81%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.52%

19.35%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

24.05%

-5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

21.13%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

21.13%

-2.93%

NSI vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSI vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

NSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NSI
National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
1.15%1.69%3.39%0.34%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSI and SHLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to NSI (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSI dropped -18.77% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, NSI leads with 45.09% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NSI has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NSI has performed better with a 45.09% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NSI.

NSI has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

NSI is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. NSI tracks Alerian National Security Emerging Markets Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NSI and 0.50% for SHLD.

NSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSI and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer