NSI vs. MAGO
NSI (National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF) and MAGO (Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NSI is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Alerian National Security Emerging Markets Index, while MAGO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tuttle. NSI is passively managed, while MAGO is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NSI charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGO.
Performance
NSI vs. MAGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSI achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than MAGO's -5.64% return.
NSI
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 34.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NSI vs. MAGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF | 12.82% | -0.35% |
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF | -5.64% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSI and MAGO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSI vs. MAGO — Risk / Return Rank
NSI
MAGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NSI vs. MAGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) and Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF (MAGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSI | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSI vs. MAGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSI drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, roughly equal to the maximum MAGO drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSI and MAGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSI | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -18.21% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.47% | -12.08% | +6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -5.68% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | — | — |
Volatility
NSI vs. MAGO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSI | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 24.22% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 24.22% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 24.22% | -5.44% |
NSI vs. MAGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGO's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSI vs. MAGO - Dividend Comparison
NSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than MAGO's 8.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF | 8.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.22% | 1.69% | 3.39% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSI and MAGO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NSI.
MAGO has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 1.22% for NSI.
NSI is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while MAGO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NSI and 0.99% for MAGO.
Find the right allocation for NSI and MAGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer