PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSGRX vs. FTHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSGRX achieves a 22.59% return, which is significantly higher than FTHNX's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NSGRX has underperformed FTHNX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while FTHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.


NSGRX

1D
1.54%
1M
0.10%
6M
15.34%
YTD
22.59%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
8.33%

FTHNX

1D
1.27%
1M
3.14%
6M
12.68%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.88%
ALL TIME*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
22.59%10.57%10.44%16.96%-16.14%19.99%14.53%23.30%-10.22%13.05%
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
18.31%11.69%15.81%22.18%-7.73%30.44%10.05%27.74%-13.45%17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NSGRX and FTHNX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015

0.93

The correlation between NSGRX and FTHNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSGRX vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NSGRX
NSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHNX
FTHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FTHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSGRXFTHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

3.21

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

11.54

+3.68

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FTHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSGRX and FTHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSGRX drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSGRX and FTHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSGRXFTHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-37.78%

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-9.44%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-24.63%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-24.63%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.37%

-37.78%

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.04%

-5.62%

-16.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.62%

-0.19%

Volatility

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Small Cap Core Fund (NSGRX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSGRXFTHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.56%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

10.80%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.23%

14.89%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

18.79%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

20.07%

+3.28%

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSGRX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSGRX vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison

NSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.93%, more than FTHNX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
0.24%0.28%7.84%1.60%0.95%3.55%0.11%0.11%0.21%0.09%0.00%15.47%
NSGRX
Northern Small Cap Core Fund
12.93%15.85%17.77%6.90%0.55%15.75%5.00%6.30%1.26%4.35%0.67%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSGRX and FTHNX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSGRX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to FTHNX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSGRX dropped -64.89% vs FTHNX's -37.78%.

FTHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSGRX and FTHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer