NSDVX vs. PCSVX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NSDVX (North Star Dividend Fund) and PCSVX (PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX returned 7.01%/yr vs 8.54%/yr for PCSVX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NSDVX charges 1.37%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for PCSVX.

Performance

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NSDVX having a 13.38% return and PCSVX slightly higher at 13.64%. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX has underperformed PCSVX with an annualized return of 7.01%, while PCSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.54% annualized return.

NSDVX

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.38%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 3.30%
• 10Y*: 7.01%

PCSVX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 13.64%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 4.15%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund	13.38%	-1.31%	9.25%	8.06%	-6.36%	16.16%	6.51%	16.13%	-12.35%	8.27%
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	13.64%	4.33%	6.24%	12.57%	-13.44%	25.68%	12.13%	25.80%	-16.67%	9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NSDVX and PCSVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2013	0.80

The correlation between NSDVX and PCSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NSDVX vs. PCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSDVX

NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 21
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

PCSVX

PCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 45
PCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NSDVX	PCSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.79	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.71	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.31	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	3.04	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.32	9.15	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the PCSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSDVX and PCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NSDVX	PCSVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.79	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.19	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.38	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.38	+0.08

Drawdowns

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSDVX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum PCSVX drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSDVX and PCSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NSDVX	PCSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.64%	-62.95%	+24.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.48%	-9.67%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.41%	-34.96%	+18.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-34.96%	+12.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.64%	-46.65%	+8.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-3.50%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-10.58%	+4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	3.20%	+0.38%

Volatility

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) is 3.75%, while PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that NSDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NSDVX	PCSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	4.48%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	11.68%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	16.53%	-1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	22.36%	-6.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	22.98%	-5.29%

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSDVX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than PCSVX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

NSDVX vs. PCSVX - Dividend Comparison

NSDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than PCSVX's 3.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund	2.94%	3.45%	7.00%	2.52%	6.57%	3.31%	1.52%	2.64%	6.87%	2.48%	4.67%	3.51%
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments	3.12%	3.54%	18.45%	0.69%	22.49%	16.23%	0.61%	0.83%	7.14%	11.82%	2.62%	11.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NSDVX and PCSVX in my portfolio?

NSDVX and PCSVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NSDVX or PCSVX?

PCSVX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to NSDVX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSDVX dropped -38.64% vs PCSVX's -62.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.