PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSDVX vs. CSMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSDVX achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly higher than CSMIX's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX has underperformed CSMIX with an annualized return of 7.17%, while CSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.


NSDVX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.60%
YTD
15.13%
6M
14.11%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
7.17%

CSMIX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.30%
YTD
14.05%
6M
14.39%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
15.13%-1.31%9.25%8.06%-6.36%16.16%6.51%16.13%-12.35%8.27%
CSMIX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I
14.05%14.65%8.66%21.42%-8.87%28.95%7.82%21.01%-18.37%13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NSDVX and CSMIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2013

0.84

The correlation between NSDVX and CSMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSDVX vs. CSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSDVX
NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMIX
CSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSDVXCSMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.39

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

11.95

-5.73

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the CSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSDVX and CSMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSDVXCSMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.24

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.43

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.49

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Drawdowns

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSDVX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum CSMIX drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSDVX and CSMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSDVXCSMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-53.37%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-11.94%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-25.98%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-25.98%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-48.42%

+9.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

0.00%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-8.92%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.38%

+0.19%

Volatility

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) is 3.51%, while Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that NSDVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSDVXCSMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

4.59%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

11.78%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

18.05%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

21.49%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

23.93%

-6.24%

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSDVX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSDVX vs. CSMIX - Dividend Comparison

NSDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than CSMIX's 12.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMIX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I
12.47%14.23%6.67%7.57%6.02%13.34%0.50%3.58%9.79%11.56%11.58%12.73%
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
2.90%3.45%7.00%2.52%6.57%3.31%1.52%2.64%6.87%2.48%4.67%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSDVX and CSMIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSMIX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to NSDVX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSDVX dropped -38.64% vs CSMIX's -53.37%.

CSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSDVX and CSMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer