PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSDVX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSDVX achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NSDVX has underperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 7.17%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.


NSDVX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.60%
YTD
15.13%
6M
14.11%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
7.17%

ARSMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
15.13%-1.31%9.25%8.06%-6.36%16.16%6.51%16.13%-12.35%8.27%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
-0.63%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NSDVX and ARSMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2013

0.82

The correlation between NSDVX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSDVX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSDVX
NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSDVXARSMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

0.11

+1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

0.25

+2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.03

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.15

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.22

0.35

+5.87

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSDVX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSDVXARSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.11

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.20

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Drawdowns

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSDVX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSDVX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSDVXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-51.75%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-10.37%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-19.34%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-19.34%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-42.96%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-8.08%

+6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-8.11%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

4.34%

-0.77%

Volatility

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 2.96%. This indicates that NSDVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSDVXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

2.96%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

10.18%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

14.38%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

17.78%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

19.58%

-1.89%

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSDVX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSDVX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

NSDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
2.90%3.45%7.00%2.52%6.57%3.31%1.52%2.64%6.87%2.48%4.67%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSDVX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSDVX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to ARSMX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSDVX dropped -38.64% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

NSDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSDVX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer