NSCI vs. NUMV
NSCI (Nuveen Securitized Income ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NSCI is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. NSCI is actively managed, while NUMV is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NSCI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
NSCI vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSCI achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's 11.33% return.
NSCI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 23.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- —
NSCI vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NSCI Nuveen Securitized Income ETF | 2.21% | 1.66% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 11.33% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSCI and NUMV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSCI vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
NSCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUMV
NSCI vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Securitized Income ETF (NSCI) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSCI | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSCI vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSCI drawdown since its inception was -1.10%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSCI and NUMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSCI | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -43.46% | +42.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -6.85% | +6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility
NSCI vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSCI | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30% | 12.57% | -11.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 17.37% | -16.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 19.73% | -18.43% |
NSCI vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSCI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSCI vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
NSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than NUMV's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSCI Nuveen Securitized Income ETF | 3.04% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.38% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSCI and NUMV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for NSCI.
NSCI has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.38% for NUMV.
NSCI is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NSCI and 0.31% for NUMV.
Find the right allocation for NSCI and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer