PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF (NSCE.TO) and Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSCE.TO achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than DRFC.TO's 11.16% return.


NSCE.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
3.11%
6M
10.32%
YTD
9.91%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*

DRFC.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.03%
6M
6.78%
YTD
11.16%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NSCE.TO
NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF
9.91%7.84%20.43%12.78%-0.27%20.35%10.51%
DRFC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
11.16%30.94%25.27%16.28%-0.80%29.17%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NSCE.TO and DRFC.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2020

0.33

The correlation between NSCE.TO and DRFC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSCE.TO
NSCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NSCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NSCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DRFC.TO
DRFC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRFC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF (NSCE.TO) and Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSCE.TODRFC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.39

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

3.08

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.01

13.21

-12.20

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the DRFC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSCE.TO and DRFC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.18%, smaller than the maximum DRFC.TO drawdown of -39.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSCE.TO and DRFC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSCE.TODRFC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-39.87%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.52%

-9.65%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.52%

-10.87%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-14.04%

+2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.31%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-3.92%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

2.25%

+2.05%

Volatility

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF (NSCE.TO) is 2.02%, while Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFC.TO) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that NSCE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSCE.TODRFC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.66%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

11.32%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

13.67%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

13.77%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

16.74%

-1.87%

Dividends

NSCE.TO vs. DRFC.TO - Dividend Comparison

NSCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than DRFC.TO's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFC.TO
Desjardins RI Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF
1.46%1.58%1.94%2.34%2.23%2.33%2.94%4.77%0.70%
NSCE.TO
NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF
0.93%0.89%1.00%1.14%0.90%1.06%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSCE.TO and DRFC.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSCE.TO is categorized as Sustainable, while DRFC.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: National Bank Investments and Desjardins.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSCE.TO and DRFC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer