NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO
NSCE.TO (NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF) and EVO.TO (Evovest Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NSCE.TO is a Sustainable fund actively managed by National Bank Investments, while EVO.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by National Bank Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NSCE.TO returned -0.65% vs 10.06% for EVO.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NSCE.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for EVO.TO.
Performance
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSCE.TO achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than EVO.TO's 8.74% return.
NSCE.TO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 3.50%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
EVO.TO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NSCE.TO NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF | 3.50% | 7.84% | 10.59% |
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF | 8.74% | 14.20% | 6.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSCE.TO and EVO.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NSCE.TO
EVO.TO
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF (NSCE.TO) and Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSCE.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.86 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 2.48 | -2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSCE.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 0.65 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.82 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, which is greater than EVO.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSCE.TO and EVO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSCE.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -12.72% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -11.77% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -1.51% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -2.42% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 4.06% | +0.25% |
Volatility
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF (NSCE.TO) is 3.25%, while Evovest Global Equity ETF (EVO.TO) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that NSCE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSCE.TO | EVO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | 3.45% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 13.42% | -4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 15.43% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 16.69% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 805.21% | 16.69% | +788.52% |
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSCE.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than EVO.TO's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSCE.TO vs. EVO.TO - Dividend Comparison
NSCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than EVO.TO's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVO.TO Evovest Global Equity ETF | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NSCE.TO NBI Sustainable Canadian Equity ETF | 0.91% | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.15% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSCE.TO and EVO.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NSCE.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NSCE.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for EVO.TO.
NSCE.TO is categorized as Sustainable, while EVO.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for NSCE.TO and 1.15% for EVO.TO.
Find the right allocation for NSCE.TO and EVO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer