PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSBRX vs. VPCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund (VPCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than VPCCX's 29.33% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has underperformed VPCCX with an annualized return of 12.76%, while VPCCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.09% annualized return.


NSBRX

1D
0.44%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.36%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
12.76%

VPCCX

1D
0.80%
1M
13.00%
YTD
29.33%
6M
30.52%
1Y
63.34%
3Y*
29.17%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
17.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
3.56%10.03%17.56%15.08%-9.63%27.17%9.79%41.88%-4.36%20.07%
VPCCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund
29.33%29.96%12.72%23.58%-12.43%24.30%12.04%27.70%-4.89%26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NSBRX and VPCCX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2006

0.89

The correlation between NSBRX and VPCCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSBRX vs. VPCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSBRX
NSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VPCCX
VPCCX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VPCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VPCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund (VPCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSBRXVPCCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

3.97

-2.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

5.32

-3.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.70

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

6.31

-4.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

28.76

-23.34

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the VPCCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSBRX and VPCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSBRXVPCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

3.97

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.96

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.91

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.69

-0.10

Drawdowns

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum VPCCX drawdown of -47.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and VPCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSBRXVPCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-47.53%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-10.29%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.89%

-19.92%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.79%

-22.75%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-34.60%

+0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-5.75%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.25%

-0.07%

Volatility

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) is 2.33%, while Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund (VPCCX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that NSBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSBRXVPCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

6.69%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

13.22%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

16.36%

-6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

17.65%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.76%

-2.17%

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VPCCX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSBRX vs. VPCCX - Dividend Comparison

NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, less than VPCCX's 13.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
11.67%9.26%6.82%3.01%3.58%3.67%4.68%15.68%7.04%4.57%1.75%6.24%
VPCCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund
13.34%17.25%7.17%5.73%8.40%6.89%7.89%6.99%9.45%4.10%5.52%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSBRX and VPCCX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPCCX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to NSBRX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSBRX dropped -45.14% vs VPCCX's -47.53%.

VPCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSBRX and VPCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer