PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSBRX vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 12.76%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


NSBRX

1D
0.44%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.36%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
12.76%

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
3.56%10.03%17.56%15.08%-9.63%27.17%9.79%41.88%-4.36%20.07%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NSBRX and SWPPX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2006

0.94

The correlation between NSBRX and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSBRX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSBRX
NSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSBRXSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.36

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

15.67

-10.25

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSBRX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSBRXSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.52

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.85

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.86

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.51

+0.08

Drawdowns

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSBRXSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-55.06%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-8.89%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.89%

-18.74%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.79%

-24.51%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-33.80%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-9.95%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.90%

+0.28%

Volatility

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) is 2.33%, while Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that NSBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSBRXSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

2.83%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

8.98%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

11.87%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

16.93%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.23%

-1.64%

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSBRX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
11.67%9.26%6.82%3.01%3.58%3.67%4.68%15.68%7.04%4.57%1.75%6.24%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSBRX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWPPX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to NSBRX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSBRX dropped -45.14% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSBRX and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer