PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSBRX vs. FAZTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund (FAZTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than FAZTX's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has outperformed FAZTX with an annualized return of 12.67%, while FAZTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.


NSBRX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.02%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
12.67%

FAZTX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.66%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
2.04%10.03%17.56%15.08%-9.63%27.17%9.79%41.88%-4.36%20.07%
FAZTX
Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund
1.75%3.09%2.00%5.93%-10.29%1.87%5.17%7.33%0.69%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between NSBRX and FAZTX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2006

-0.08

The correlation between NSBRX and FAZTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NSBRX vs. FAZTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSBRX
NSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FAZTX
FAZTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAZTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAZTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAZTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FAZTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAZTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund (FAZTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NSBRXFAZTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.68

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.70

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

8.67

-3.95

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FAZTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSBRX and FAZTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than FAZTX's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and FAZTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NSBRXFAZTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-19.00%

-26.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-2.63%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.89%

-6.39%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.79%

-15.24%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-15.24%

-18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.26%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-2.47%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.82%

+1.39%

Volatility

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund (FAZTX) at 0.70%. This indicates that NSBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAZTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NSBRXFAZTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

0.70%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

1.83%

+5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

2.56%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

3.96%

+10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

4.01%

+12.59%

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FAZTX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

NSBRX vs. FAZTX - Dividend Comparison

NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, more than FAZTX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAZTX
Nuveen Arizona Municipal Bond Fund
2.87%3.09%3.07%2.70%2.56%2.02%2.58%2.89%2.81%2.58%2.82%3.39%
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
11.84%9.26%6.82%3.01%3.58%3.67%4.68%15.68%7.04%4.57%1.75%6.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


NSBRX and FAZTX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSBRX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to FAZTX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSBRX dropped -45.14% vs FAZTX's -19.00%.

FAZTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NSBRX and FAZTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer