NSBRX vs. AMFEX
NSBRX (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund) and AMFEX (AAMA Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NSBRX returned 9.37%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for AMFEX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NSBRX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for AMFEX.
Performance
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 14.42% return.
NSBRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
AMFEX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 5.21% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -7.60% |
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 14.42% | 17.33% | 16.28% | 17.32% | -14.08% | 22.58% | 12.70% | 24.62% | -9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between NSBRX and AMFEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between NSBRX and AMFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NSBRX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank
NSBRX
AMFEX
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NSBRX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 3.96 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 16.52 | -11.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and AMFEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSBRX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -30.41% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -6.07% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.89% | -15.23% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.79% | -21.21% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -4.23% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.46% | +0.78% |
Volatility
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.45%. This indicates that NSBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NSBRX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.45% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 7.77% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 10.11% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 14.22% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 16.84% | -0.28% |
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
NSBRX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison
NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than AMFEX's 10.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 10.48% | 11.99% | 9.19% | 0.92% | 4.82% | 0.22% | 0.44% | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 11.45% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NSBRX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSBRX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to AMFEX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NSBRX dropped -45.14% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.
AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NSBRX and AMFEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer