PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NSBDX vs. APFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Star Bond Fund (NSBDX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NSBDX
North Star Bond Fund
-0.45%3.67%5.17%6.07%-1.56%
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.02%10.21%11.33%6.67%6.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSBDX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than APFPX's 4.02% return.


NSBDX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.04%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
2.29%

APFPX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.15%
YTD
4.02%
6M
7.27%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NSBDX vs. APFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSBDX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than APFPX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NSBDX vs. APFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSBDX
NSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

APFPX
APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Star Bond Fund (NSBDX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NSBDXAPFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

5.02

-3.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

7.27

-5.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

2.27

-1.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

6.23

-4.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.53

30.52

-24.99

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the APFPX Sharpe Ratio of 5.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSBDX and APFPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NSBDXAPFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

5.02

-3.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

3.73

-3.16

Correlation

The correlation between NSBDX and APFPX is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Dividend Comparison

NSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than APFPX's 4.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSBDX
North Star Bond Fund
4.18%3.72%4.48%3.45%2.49%2.72%3.23%3.34%3.50%3.61%2.98%2.86%
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.92%4.01%6.18%6.89%8.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSBDX drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, which is greater than APFPX's maximum drawdown of -2.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBDX and APFPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NSBDXAPFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-2.10%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-1.73%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

0.00%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-0.25%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.41%

+0.09%

Volatility

NSBDX vs. APFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Star Bond Fund (NSBDX) is 0.88%, while Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that NSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NSBDXAPFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.24%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

1.86%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

2.64%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

2.75%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

2.75%

+1.15%