NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE
NS4E.DE (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)) and EJAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - NS4E.DE tracks the JPX-Nikkei Index 400 while EJAP.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NS4E.DE returned 13.98%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for EJAP.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NS4E.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EJAP.DE.
Performance
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NS4E.DE achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly higher than EJAP.DE's 15.22% return. Over the past 10 years, NS4E.DE has outperformed EJAP.DE with an annualized return of 13.98%, while EJAP.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.72% annualized return.
NS4E.DE
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 42.35%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
EJAP.DE
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NS4E.DE Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) | 17.06% | 27.33% | 22.81% | 33.35% | -4.26% | 10.90% | 7.50% | 17.31% | -17.52% | 19.58% |
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 15.22% | 11.71% | 14.53% | 16.90% | -12.15% | 10.08% | 5.26% | 22.36% | -93.57% | 299,592.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NS4E.DE and EJAP.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between NS4E.DE and EJAP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NS4E.DE
EJAP.DE
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NS4E.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 3.05 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | 9.71 | +5.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NS4E.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, smaller than the maximum EJAP.DE drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NS4E.DE and EJAP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NS4E.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -99.96% | +64.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -10.33% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.96% | -16.93% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.96% | -18.46% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | -99.96% | +64.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -86.84% | +82.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -51.65% | +43.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.25% | -0.44% |
Volatility
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) is 6.07%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that NS4E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EJAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NS4E.DE | EJAP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 6.68% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.68% | 16.45% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 20.18% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 16.87% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 6,120.35% | -6,102.15% |
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NS4E.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EJAP.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NS4E.DE vs. EJAP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NS4E.DE nor EJAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NS4E.DE and EJAP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EJAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EJAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NS4E.DE.
NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400, while EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NS4E.DE and 0.15% for EJAP.DE.
Find the right allocation for NS4E.DE and EJAP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer