PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRSH vs. KAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRSH vs. KAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Scharf ETF (KAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 43.49% return, which is significantly higher than KAT's 1.55% return.


NRSH

1D
2.35%
1M
-1.17%
6M
33.64%
YTD
43.49%
1Y
49.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAT

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.74%
6M
0.17%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRSH vs. KAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
43.49%7.52%
KAT
Scharf ETF
1.55%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NRSH and KAT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

0.33

NRSH vs. KAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NRSH
KAT

Industrials

57.9%
14.6%

Technology

36.7%
14.3%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Energy

2.5%
6.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Communication Services

-

6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.3%

Financial Services

-

25.1%

Healthcare

-

22.3%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

NRSH
57.9%
KAT
14.6%

Technology

NRSH
36.7%
KAT
14.3%

Real Estate

NRSH
5.4%
KAT

-

Energy

NRSH
2.5%
KAT
6.6%

Basic Materials

NRSH

-

KAT
3.3%

Communication Services

NRSH

-

KAT
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NRSH

-

KAT
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

NRSH

-

KAT
2.3%

Financial Services

NRSH

-

KAT
25.1%

Healthcare

NRSH

-

KAT
22.3%

Utilities

NRSH

-

KAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRSH vs. KAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRSH vs. KAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Scharf ETF (KAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRSHKATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.73

NRSH vs. KAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRSH vs. KAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than KAT's maximum drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and KAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRSHKATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-9.25%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-3.86%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-3.46%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

Volatility

NRSH vs. KAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRSHKATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.80%

10.59%

+16.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

10.59%

+11.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

10.59%

+11.72%

NRSH vs. KAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NRSH and KAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NRSH vs. KAT - Dividend Comparison

NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than KAT's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.29%0.42%0.90%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRSH and KAT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NRSH and KAT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.08% for KAT.

They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Scharf Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRSH and KAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer