NRSH vs. ITOT
NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return while ITOT tracks the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NRSH returned 58.80% vs 28.12% for ITOT. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NRSH charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
NRSH vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 47.92% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
NRSH vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRSH and ITOT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between NRSH and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
NRSH vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NRSH
ITOT
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
NRSH
ITOT
Technology
NRSH
ITOT
Real Estate
NRSH
ITOT
Energy
NRSH
ITOT
Basic Materials
NRSH
-
ITOT
Communication Services
NRSH
-
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
NRSH
-
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
NRSH
-
ITOT
Financial Services
NRSH
-
ITOT
Healthcare
NRSH
-
ITOT
Utilities
NRSH
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRSH vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
NRSH
ITOT
NRSH vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRSH | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.40 | 3.17 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.86 | 14.57 | +2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRSH | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.32 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.57 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
NRSH vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRSH | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -55.20% | +31.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -8.90% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -6.97% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 1.94% | +1.56% |
Volatility
NRSH vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that NRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRSH | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.21% | 2.99% | +6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.27% | 9.13% | +11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.44% | 12.20% | +12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 17.36% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 18.26% | +3.28% |
NRSH vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRSH vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRSH and ITOT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRSH dropped -24.01% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 28.12% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NRSH and 0.03% for ITOT.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRSH and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer