PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRSH vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRSH vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 47.92% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


NRSH

1D
0.51%
1M
13.93%
YTD
47.92%
6M
46.01%
1Y
58.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRSH vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
47.92%12.95%-6.17%8.65%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-5.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NRSH and DBE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between NRSH and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRSH vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRSH vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRSHDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

5.89

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.86

11.53

+5.33

NRSH vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRSH and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRSHDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.43

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.09

+1.01

Drawdowns

NRSH vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRSHDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-86.69%

+62.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-14.41%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.27%

+30.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-57.31%

+51.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

7.35%

-3.85%

Volatility

NRSH vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) is 9.21%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that NRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRSHDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

12.95%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.27%

30.86%

-10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

34.97%

-10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

29.39%

-7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

28.33%

-6.79%

NRSH vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRSH vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.28%0.42%0.90%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRSH and DBE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to NRSH (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRSH dropped -24.01% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 58.80% for NRSH. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NRSH has been the lower-risk option at 9.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 58.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.

NRSH is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NRSH and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRSH and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer