NRSH vs. ACEP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NRSH is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NRSH charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.

Performance

NRSH vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 35.88% return, which is significantly higher than ACEP's 22.58% return.

NRSH

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: 23.82%
• YTD: 35.88%
• 1Y: 50.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.42%

ACEP

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: 12.04%
• YTD: 22.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	$21.90K	$29.60K	$49.01K
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	$198.65K	$150.08K	$89.39K

NRSH vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	35.88%	4.52%
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	22.58%	8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NRSH and ACEP is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.80

NRSH vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRSH	ACEP
Technology	56.1%	34.3%
Industrials	41.1%	12.1%
Real Estate	2.8%	1.6%
Energy	2.5%	12.5%
Basic Materials	-	11.1%
Communication Services	-	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.9%
Financial Services	-	14.4%
Healthcare	-	8.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NRSH vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 77
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 84

ACEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRSH vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRSH	ACEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.40	—	—

Drawdowns

NRSH vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and ACEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRSH	ACEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.01%	-7.06%	-16.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.72%	-2.10%	-6.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.58%	-1.75%	-3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NRSH	ACEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.49%	16.86%	+10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.50%	16.86%	+5.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.50%	16.86%	+5.64%

NRSH vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRSH vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison

NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	0.11%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.31%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRSH and ACEP in my portfolio?

NRSH and ACEP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NRSH or ACEP?

On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRSH or ACEP?

ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRSH or ACEP?

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

What is the main difference between NRSH and ACEP?

They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NRSH and 0.45% for ACEP.