PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRSH vs. ABIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRSH vs. ABIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRSH achieves a 47.92% return, which is significantly higher than ABIG's 7.33% return.


NRSH

1D
0.51%
1M
13.93%
YTD
47.92%
6M
46.01%
1Y
58.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABIG

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.87%
YTD
7.33%
6M
6.41%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRSH vs. ABIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRSH and ABIG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025

0.69

The correlation between NRSH and ABIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRSH vs. ABIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ABIG
ABIG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ABIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ABIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRSH vs. ABIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) and Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRSHABIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.54

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

2.14

+0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

1.46

+3.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.86

5.25

+11.60

NRSH vs. ABIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the ABIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRSH and ABIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRSHABIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.54

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.55

-0.44

Drawdowns

NRSH vs. ABIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRSH drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than ABIG's maximum drawdown of -13.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRSH and ABIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRSHABIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-13.70%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-13.70%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-2.24%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.80%

-0.30%

Volatility

NRSH vs. ABIG - Volatility Comparison

Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) at 3.26%. This indicates that NRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRSHABIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

3.26%

+5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.27%

9.99%

+10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

13.05%

+11.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

14.32%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

14.32%

+7.22%

NRSH vs. ABIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRSH has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ABIG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRSH vs. ABIG - Dividend Comparison

NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than ABIG's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ABIG
Argent Large Cap ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.28%0.42%0.90%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRSH and ABIG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to ABIG (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRSH dropped -24.01% vs ABIG's -13.70%.

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 19.99% for ABIG. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ABIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 19.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.09% for ABIG.

They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NRSH and 0.49% for ABIG.

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRSH and ABIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer