PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRK vs. FOHFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRK vs. FOHFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) and Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund (FOHFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRK achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than FOHFX's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NRK has outperformed FOHFX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while FOHFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.84% annualized return.


NRK

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.55%
YTD
9.28%
6M
10.27%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
2.33%

FOHFX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.93%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
1.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRK vs. FOHFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
9.28%4.74%5.93%7.03%-21.84%6.24%4.08%21.43%-5.98%6.16%
FOHFX
Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund
1.51%5.55%2.00%5.43%-9.28%1.18%4.10%7.08%0.40%6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NRK and FOHFX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2003

0.28

Over the past year, NRK and FOHFX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRK vs. FOHFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRK
NRK Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRK Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FOHFX
FOHFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FOHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FOHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRK vs. FOHFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) and Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund (FOHFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRKFOHFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.67

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.31

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

7.93

+1.10

NRK vs. FOHFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRK Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FOHFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRK and FOHFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRK vs. FOHFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRK drawdown since its inception was -40.18%, which is greater than FOHFX's maximum drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRK and FOHFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRKFOHFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.18%

-22.25%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-2.98%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.67%

-5.40%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.06%

-13.87%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.06%

-13.87%

-17.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.55%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-2.29%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

0.87%

+1.12%

Volatility

NRK vs. FOHFX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund (FOHFX) at 0.80%. This indicates that NRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOHFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRKFOHFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

0.80%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.67%

2.05%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

2.58%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.95%

3.68%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

3.78%

+6.57%

NRK vs. FOHFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRK has a 2.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FOHFX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRK vs. FOHFX - Dividend Comparison

NRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than FOHFX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOHFX
Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund
2.81%3.66%2.77%2.48%1.49%1.74%2.79%2.77%2.96%3.42%3.70%3.66%
NRK
Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income
7.78%8.21%6.74%4.06%5.41%4.18%4.15%3.98%4.68%4.85%5.37%5.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRK and FOHFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRK has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FOHFX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRK dropped -40.18% vs FOHFX's -22.25%.

FOHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRK and FOHFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer