FOHFX vs. BATVX
FOHFX (Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund) and BATVX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FOHFX returned 0.99%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BATVX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FOHFX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BATVX.
Performance
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOHFX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than BATVX's 0.97% return.
FOHFX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
BATVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOHFX Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund | 1.60% | 5.55% | 2.00% | 5.43% | -9.28% | 1.00% |
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 0.97% | 2.80% | 2.48% | 1.41% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOHFX and BATVX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FOHFX and BATVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOHFX vs. BATVX — Risk / Return Rank
FOHFX
BATVX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund (FOHFX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOHFX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOHFX drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than BATVX's maximum drawdown of -0.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOHFX and BATVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOHFX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -0.20% | -22.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | 0.00% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.40% | -0.10% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.87% | -0.20% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -0.03% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.00% | +0.87% |
Volatility
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund (FOHFX) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares (BATVX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FOHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOHFX | BATVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 0.20% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.05% | 0.49% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58% | 0.73% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.68% | 0.64% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 0.63% | +3.16% |
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOHFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BATVX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOHFX vs. BATVX - Dividend Comparison
FOHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than BATVX's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATVX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares | 2.55% | 2.76% | 2.44% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FOHFX Fidelity Ohio Municipal Income Fund | 2.80% | 3.66% | 2.77% | 2.48% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 2.79% | 2.77% | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.70% | 3.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOHFX and BATVX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FOHFX has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to BATVX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOHFX dropped -22.25% vs BATVX's -0.20%.
BATVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOHFX and BATVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer