NRJL.L vs. WSTCX

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and WSTCX (Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund) are both funds - NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while WSTCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Ivy Funds. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L returned 9.77%/yr vs 28.05%/yr for WSTCX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRJL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for WSTCX.

Performance

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while WSTCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WSTCX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly lower than WSTCX's 42.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L has underperformed WSTCX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while WSTCX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.05% annualized return.

NRJL.L

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 38.38%
• 6M: 37.58%
• 1Y: 79.01%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 2.89%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

WSTCX

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 42.21%
• 6M: 41.01%
• 1Y: 66.02%
• 3Y*: 62.51%
• 5Y*: 31.86%
• 10Y*: 28.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	38.38%	35.47%	-11.56%	-22.87%	-8.74%	-5.40%	33.09%	47.31%	-7.75%	15.17%
WSTCX Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund	42.21%	23.39%	121.62%	32.22%	-25.28%	13.86%	31.12%	43.54%	-0.39%	20.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NRJL.L and WSTCX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.50

The correlation between NRJL.L and WSTCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRJL.L

NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

WSTCX

WSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 81
WSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
WSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRJL.L	WSTCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.73	2.64	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.13	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.44	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.92	5.24	+2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.54	16.31	+12.24

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the WSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRJL.L and WSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, roughly equal to the maximum WSTCX drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and WSTCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRJL.L	WSTCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.56%	-56.20%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-12.91%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.16%	-45.42%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.10%	-56.20%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.56%	-56.20%	+1.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-4.08%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.11%	-11.93%	-11.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	4.13%	-1.37%

Volatility

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) is 9.59%, while Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX) has a volatility of 13.24%. This indicates that NRJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRJL.L	WSTCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	13.24%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	20.75%	-3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.06%	25.72%	-4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.92%	73.93%	-52.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.32%	54.76%	-33.44%

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WSTCX's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRJL.L vs. WSTCX - Dividend Comparison

NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than WSTCX's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.30%	0.42%	0.73%	0.77%	0.24%	0.32%	0.70%	1.02%	0.59%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%
WSTCX Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund	9.54%	13.35%	81.76%	21.98%	57.60%	61.50%	11.27%	13.85%	16.72%	7.61%	0.00%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRJL.L and WSTCX in my portfolio?

NRJL.L and WSTCX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.