PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRJL.L vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NRJL.L is traded in GBP, while SLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLV values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRJL.L achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -15.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NRJL.L has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 9.77%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


NRJL.L

1D
2.18%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
38.38%
6M
37.58%
1Y
79.01%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
9.77%

SLV

1D
1.62%
1M
-20.48%
YTD
-15.54%
6M
-21.15%
1Y
68.97%
3Y*
34.90%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
11.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
38.38%35.47%-11.56%-22.87%-8.74%-5.40%33.09%47.31%-7.75%15.17%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-15.54%127.23%23.00%-6.03%14.54%-11.63%42.98%10.51%-3.81%-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NRJL.L and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.11

Over the past year, NRJL.L and SLV have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRJL.L vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRJL.L
NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRJL.LSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.25

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.92

1.43

+6.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.54

3.17

+25.37

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRJL.L and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRJL.L drawdown since its inception was -54.56%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -69.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRJL.L and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRJL.LSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.56%

-69.62%

+15.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-48.59%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.16%

-48.59%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.10%

-48.59%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

-48.59%

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-47.20%

+43.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-38.18%

+15.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

21.83%

-19.07%

Volatility

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) is 9.59%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.77%. This indicates that NRJL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRJL.LSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

14.77%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

56.68%

-39.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

58.83%

-37.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.92%

34.52%

-12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

30.46%

-9.14%

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRJL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRJL.L vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.30%0.42%0.73%0.77%0.24%0.32%0.70%1.02%0.59%0.79%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRJL.L and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.

NRJL.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SLV is Silver. NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NRJL.L and 0.50% for SLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRJL.L and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer