PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGY.TO achieves a 37.55% return, which is significantly higher than ZCLN.TO's 15.70% return.


NRGY.TO

1D
-2.20%
1M
6.61%
6M
26.92%
YTD
37.55%
1Y
50.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.83%

ZCLN.TO

1D
5.09%
1M
-9.12%
6M
2.19%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
-1.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$140.19KCA$107.47KCA$228.07K
CA$167.51KCA$220.65KCA$322.42K

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NRGY.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF
37.55%14.36%-2.64%
ZCLN.TO
BMO Clean Energy Index ETF
15.70%35.83%-5.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGY.TO and ZCLN.TO is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRGY.TO
NRGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NRGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCLN.TO
ZCLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ZCLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGY.TOZCLN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.20

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

1.33

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.21

4.50

+9.72

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the ZCLN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGY.TO and ZCLN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum ZCLN.TO drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGY.TO and ZCLN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGY.TOZCLN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-61.18%

+44.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-27.65%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.75%

-33.44%

+29.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-40.37%

+36.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

8.17%

-4.60%

Volatility

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) is 7.29%, while BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO) has a volatility of 11.50%. This indicates that NRGY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCLN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGY.TOZCLN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

11.50%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

25.34%

-9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

31.52%

-12.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.92%

26.86%

-6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

27.68%

-7.76%

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGY.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCLN.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGY.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Dividend Comparison

NRGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than ZCLN.TO's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NRGY.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF
3.12%3.87%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZCLN.TO
BMO Clean Energy Index ETF
1.50%1.73%2.13%1.37%0.93%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGY.TO and ZCLN.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCLN.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NRGY.TO.

NRGY.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while ZCLN.TO is Alternative Energy Equities. NRGY.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index, while ZCLN.TO tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NRGY.TO and 0.39% for ZCLN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGY.TO and ZCLN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer