NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO).

NRGY.TO and CPCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NRGY.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2024. CPCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. Both NRGY.TO and CPCC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGY.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF	30.90%	-1.52%
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	0.71%	9.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGY.TO achieves a 30.90% return, which is significantly higher than CPCC.TO's 0.71% return.

NRGY.TO

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 10.66%
• YTD: 30.90%
• 6M: 31.97%
• 1Y: 41.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPCC.TO

• 1D: 6.72%
• 1M: -17.90%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGY.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CPCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

CPCC.TO

Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

NRGY.TO

Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF

Return for Risk

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGY.TO

NRGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
NRGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
NRGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NRGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
NRGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NRGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NRGY.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NRGY.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	0.84	+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between NRGY.TO and CPCC.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

NRGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than CPCC.TO's 1.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
NRGY.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF	2.87%	3.87%	0.56%
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	1.94%	0.65%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NRGY.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum CPCC.TO drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGY.TO and CPCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGY.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.59%	-27.12%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-18.06%	+16.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-5.88%	+2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NRGY.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	43.22%	-24.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.80%	43.22%	-24.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.80%	43.22%	-24.42%