PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGY.TO achieves a 38.06% return, which is significantly higher than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return.


NRGY.TO

1D
0.97%
1M
2.95%
YTD
38.06%
6M
34.29%
1Y
53.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ENCC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.37%
YTD
29.01%
6M
25.71%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
25.31%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGY.TO and ENCC.TO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.94

The correlation between NRGY.TO and ENCC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NRGY.TO
ENCC.TO

Energy

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

NRGY.TO
100.0%
ENCC.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Communication Services

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Financial Services

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Healthcare

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Industrials

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Real Estate

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Technology

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Utilities

NRGY.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGY.TO
NRGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NRGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRGY.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.53

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.66

4.93

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.67

17.54

+1.13

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGY.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRGY.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.98

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.00

+1.60

Drawdowns

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGY.TO and ENCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGY.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-89.91%

+73.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-8.48%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-1.99%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-39.82%

+36.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.38%

+0.49%

Volatility

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) at 5.66%. This indicates that NRGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGY.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

5.66%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

12.36%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

14.08%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.53%

23.03%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

29.05%

-9.52%

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGY.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

NRGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
11.09%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.09%8.35%6.92%4.77%15.15%
NRGY.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF
3.06%3.87%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NRGY.TO and ENCC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NRGY.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NRGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

NRGY.TO is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NRGY.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGY.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer