PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

NRGU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NRGU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, NRGU.TO returned 3.88%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for QQCC.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU.TO achieves a 48.99% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's 19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, NRGU.TO has outperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of 3.88%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.

NRGU.TO

1D
-0.51%
1M
-15.98%
YTD
48.99%
6M
47.81%
1Y
91.01%
3Y*
33.54%
5Y*
39.04%
10Y*
3.88%

QQCC.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
3.72%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.83%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NRGU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF		48.99%21.43%16.67%-5.38%96.21%201.95%-76.24%9.01%-51.57%-25.98%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		19.37%11.64%33.42%35.92%-55.98%5.24%-6.26%12.55%-18.79%15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGU.TO and QQCC.TO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011

0.33

The correlation between NRGU.TO and QQCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO

Return for Risk

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NRGU.TO
NRGU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NRGU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NRGU.TOQQCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.94
2.32

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.29
3.13

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

4.16

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

14.76

-5.04

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than QQCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU.TO and QQCC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NRGU.TOQQCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-67.77%

-31.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.71%

-8.15%

-23.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.12%

-22.24%

-28.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-59.13%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.54%

-62.91%

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.78%

-21.01%

-66.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.54%

-28.26%

-55.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.40%

2.29%

+7.11%

Volatility

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 7.78%. This indicates that NRGU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NRGU.TOQQCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

7.78%

+8.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.33%

12.24%

+28.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.14%

14.62%

+32.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.20%

28.41%

+28.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.50%

23.30%

+43.20%

Dividends

NRGU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

NRGU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRGU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		10.42%11.27%9.84%11.79%11.06%2.58%2.92%3.14%3.96%3.00%3.36%4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

NRGU.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU.TO and QQCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer