NRGD vs. SOXL
NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - NRGD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -80.85% vs 1438.30% for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
NRGD vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -70.71% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return.
NRGD
- 1D
- -5.59%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- -70.71%
- 6M
- -67.28%
- 1Y
- -80.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- 5.34%
- 1M
- 119.95%
- YTD
- 567.48%
- 6M
- 502.28%
- 1Y
- 1,438.30%
- 3Y*
- 135.13%
- 5Y*
- 48.72%
- 10Y*
- 65.39%
NRGD vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -70.71% | -32.37% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 567.48% | 33.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGD and SOXL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.11 |
The correlation between NRGD and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.03 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NRGD vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NRGD
SOXL
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
NRGD
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Financial Services
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Technology
NRGD
-
SOXL
Utilities
NRGD
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRGD vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
NRGD
SOXL
NRGD vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | 14.28 | -15.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | 5.17 | -7.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.72 | -0.98 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 33.47 | -34.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 114.79 | -116.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.09 | 14.28 | -15.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.81 | 0.52 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
NRGD vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.64% | -90.46% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.88% | -43.47% | -39.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -87.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.24% | 0.00% | -89.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.88% | -35.01% | -23.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.87% | 12.65% | +40.22% |
Volatility
NRGD vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) is 29.27%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that NRGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRGD | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.27% | 40.82% | -11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.52% | 81.29% | -22.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.26% | 102.11% | -27.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.83% | 107.25% | -18.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.83% | 99.04% | -10.21% |
NRGD vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRGD vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRGD and SOXL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to NRGD (29.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -89.64% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 1-year performance, SOXL leads with 1438.30% vs -80.85% for NRGD. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NRGD has been the lower-risk option at 29.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 1438.30% return vs -80.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.
NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRGD and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer